Given your response, this article did exactly what I wanted it to do. For every point I made about banning the internet or free speech or whatever you countered with the appropriate argument based on rights and individuals liberties.

And to be clear, I believe none of what I said in this article. But this is what A2 supporters hear and respond with when someone attacks the 2A. If you read it carefully all I did was take common attacks against the 2A and switch it with the 1A. And you replied, just as 2A advocates do by pointing out the infringement on rights it would cause, the approach to tyranny, and absurdity of some of the reasoning.

Hope that clears it up. This is what gun owners hear when they read or hear anti- 2A arguments. To make it impactful I switch which right was attacked.